等着我

Toddler 'formulas' are unnecessary and lack nutritional benefits of milk, pediatrician group warns_我的网站

A |     Beverages marketed as toddler "formula" are unnecessary and some have questionable marketing practices, according to a new report from the American Academy of Pediatrics.In recent years, the popularity of these formulas — referred to as Older Infant and Young Child Formulas (OIYCFs) — has risen significantly, according to research published in the journal Public Health Nutrition. The study found sales went up by 158% between 2006 and 2015. However, experts say there are several concerns surrounding their usage."Many parents mistakenly believe that OIYCFs offer something more, something unique that cow milk together with a varied diet with fortified foods can't provide," Dr. George Fuchs, professor of pediatrics and epidemiology at the University of Kentucky and lead author on the new AAP report, told ABC News. "This misconception can be largely attributed to the advertising and branding of these products."The AAP recommends babies drink infant formula or breastmilk until they are 12 months old and then transition to cow's milk in addition to solid foods, which are typically introduced at about 6 months.Toddler "formula" is sometimes marketed as a "transitional" or "weaning" formula for infants who are 0 -12 months old, according to the new report. But unlike infant formula, which must meet certain FDA guidelines for nutritional content, there are no standard nutritional requirements for toddler "formula," the report says."Toddler formula is unnecessary for the vast majority of toddlers and its nutritional value is inferior to that of whole cow's milk, especially when accounting for the additional sugar content of toddler formula," Dr. Keyana Washington, a pediatrician with Gwinnett Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine in Georgia, who was not involved with the report, told ABC News.There are misconceptions about the drinks, according to Dr. Nagela Sainté-Thomas, a pediatric emergency medicine specialist from El Paso, Texas."One reason for their popularity is parents and caregivers believe these drinks provide nutrients similar to solid foods and if they have significant challenges integrating solids into their toddler's diet, they can easily utilize this 'nutritional' substitution," Sainté-Thomas, who was not involved in the AAP report, told ABC News.In 1986, The World Health Assembly had already identified special formulas for older infants as unnecessary. Many global health organizations -- including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and UNICEF, in addition to WHO -- emphasize that a combination of breast milk, whole cow's milk, water, and appropriate solid foods is nutritionally sufficient for most toddlers.Toddler "formulas" are not necessarily dangerous or bad for children, the AAP said in its report. They can be part of a balanced diet for babies 12 months and older, but are not better than cow's milk, the report said.But some companies making OIYCFs imply that their products add an important part of a toddler diet, even though that's not the case, according to the new AAP report.OIYCFs often appear very similar to infant formulas, according to the AAP report, which may cause confusion among parents and caregivers. Some companies use similar names, colors, designs, and even slogans for their OIYCFs and infant formulas, the report found.The pediatricians ABC News spoke with say parents and caregivers should make sure toddlers have a varied diet that includes fruits, vegetables, whole grains, proteins, dairy, water, and either breast milk, infant formula, or whole cow's milk.Parents and caregivers should talk to their pediatricians about the role OIYCFs might play in their child's diet."The decision to deviate from the recommendation to give whole cow's milk starting at age 12 months is one that parents should make in consultation with their pediatrician," Washington said.Daniel A. Carnegie, MD, MPH, MBA is a preventive medicine resident at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a member of the ABC News Medical Unit.。    【TechWeb】7月20日，小米安全中心发布《MiSRC违规事件处置公告》，通报一起白帽子在安全测试中严重越权、构成实质性安全侵害的事件，并公布相关处理决定与行业警示。         公告显示，2026年6月26日下午，小米反入侵安全团队处置了一起影响范围较大的业务入侵安全事件。当晚，涉事白帽子刘某通过MiSRC平台提交了一份与该入侵事件高度关联的漏洞报告。经小米安全团队应急响应调查核实，其行为已超出正常漏洞挖掘范畴，构成“实质性安全侵害”，属于严重突破授权边界的违规行为。         小米指出，该行为违反《小米安全中心安全漏洞奖励规则V10.0》的基本原则：公司反对和谴责以漏洞测试为名，利用安全漏洞进行破坏、损害用户利益的黑客行为，包括但不限于：利用漏洞盗取用户隐私及虚拟财产、入侵业务系统、非授权获取系统（业务）数据、窃取用户数据、恶意传播漏洞或数据等。

B | 如有上述行为，企业有权依法追究其法律责任。         基于上述情况，小米安全团队作出三项处理决定：          一是取消涉事白帽子本次提交漏洞的全部奖励，相关漏洞不计入任何荣誉或排名；          二是对本次违规事件进行公开通报；          三是保留依据《中华人民共和国网络安全法》等法律法规，对涉事白帽子追究法律责任的权利。

C |          公告同时面向全体白帽子发出郑重提醒：所有安全测试必须严格限定在官方授权范围内，严禁利用MiSRC平台掩盖任何非法入侵、数据窃取等违规操作；任何试图通过提交漏洞来规避安全追溯的行为，小米安全团队将“一追到底、严肃处理”。         据介绍，MiSRC是小米面向全球白帽子开放的官方漏洞提交平台。白帽子（白帽黑客）是指在获得企业授权的前提下，合规挖掘网络漏洞的安全技术人员，其核心价值在于帮助企业提前发现并修复风险，守护网络安全生态。

Current article:http://q8gq.dingruorenhongqiaminmeipeiliu.cyou/8rl5pcr/dcd7.html

Published on:10:32:47